Does this torque figure seem high?

[Jimbob 2705]

Company called 'Monster Tuning Ltd' in Telford have apparently mapped the Clio I bought,

Reason I say apparently is that I don't have the dyno results in paper

So I did a bit of searching on their FB and actually found that they did Remap it, well there's a photo of the car on their Dyno at least :



They also posted the results on FB, and I'll admit there's no proof whatsoever (like Reg of car on printout or anything, although it could be the bit cut off the Left hand side)



Power seems to be better than most standard 182's, don't most make mid 170's?

The thing which shocked me is the torque, doesn't that seems fairly high for a 182?

Only performance mods that I know of is a decat and straight through exhaust system...which I don't even know if that counts as an performance mod haha

I think they're a fairly big company, having 46k likes on FB, they can't be bad! I'd hope their Dyno is pretty accurate too since they are specialists in mapping from what I can see

 

[Jimbob 2705]

I'm assuming that the torque result is 163.1 ft/lb...unless I'm reading the wrong one (wouldn't be surprised haha)

 

[N4TH4N]

Dynos almost always over read as most people will confirm on here. I'd take with a pinch of salt. Although I wouldn't image those figures are far off. Seems to be a healthy/correctly timed up 182.

 

[warwickstingray]

Pretty favourable conditions you have in the corner there. A less favourable day would see that drop 5 or 6bhp. If they used an iso standard correction that would end up as a figure in the 170s.

 

[Martin_172]

strong engine ones with exhaust, filter, matched/good inlets can do 160lbft

 

[JamesBryan]

My 182 made 160lbft at EFI.

That's with the 98Ron map.