ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
Processor Help
- Thread starter Gem
- Start date
Unless you're going to be using it with specific processor intensive tasks in mind, I would say stick with the former. They're both 45nm Penryn and they're clocked the same. The difference is the L2 cache. I've not seen any benchmarks though so I couldn't say how much quicker the T6400 is and, depending on what you're going to use it for, I'd argue you probably wouldn't even notice.
Darren S
ClioSport Club Member
A good article on here, Gem.....
http://www.nordichardware.com/Reviews/?page=10&skrivelse=514
Again, it doesn't give a definitive 'YES' to extra cache, but if you could afford it, I'd get it.
D.
http://www.nordichardware.com/Reviews/?page=10&skrivelse=514
Again, it doesn't give a definitive 'YES' to extra cache, but if you could afford it, I'd get it.
D.
SLK250 CDI
+1
RAM you can change. Always get the best processor you can afford at the time as it's not so easily upgraded.
Better than yours. C*nt.
I'm going to disagree with Roy and say that the Core2 line of mobile processors are worth every penny over their Pentium Dual-Core counterparts.
It won't be a 'night and day' difference, but will be quicker and slicker and the Core2 are much better at dealing with media.
It won't be a 'night and day' difference, but will be quicker and slicker and the Core2 are much better at dealing with media.
AFAIK they are both Penryn 45nm though despite the Pentium naming. The latter processor has double the L2. Obviously it's better, though. Whether or not it's £70 better I couldn't say. Basically, it's not a Pentium vs. Core 2 Duo decision.
