ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

does yours do this?



  Italian 3.2 V6
once i have a full tank, my car seems to gobble the petrol fairly quickly to the half way point. on the half way point for aagggesss, then suddenly starts to drop again after that :S just wondered if any1 else's did this? (i have a ph2 172 for the record)

btw what speed/rpm do you guys sit at for best fuel comp? i usual sit at 80mph ~4k rpm, i think sitting at anymore means the fuels get major gobbleatroned!
 
  A3 Tdi
haha i thought this was just mine, it does exactly the same! Even when driving carfully!
With regards to motorways i try and sit at 4k, feel the same as you!
 
  182 Trophy (#27/500)
well 56mph is the most economical speed to sit at but it will take you ages to get anywhere. sitting at 70 instead of 80 will save you alot of pertrol though as it will lower the revs away from the magic 5k!!!i get around 36mpg at 80mph and about 42mpg at 70mph. just depends on how much of a hurry your in!!!lol
 
  RS 172
Mine does this too, and its just a 1.2. I wonder if its something to do with how it measures the fuel, or if its just psychological. I think you tend to look at the fuel level more as it gets nearer the bottom, so maybe it seems to take longer?
 
  MCS R56
well 56mph is the most economical speed to sit at but it will take you ages to get anywhere. sitting at 70 instead of 80 will save you alot of pertrol though as it will lower the revs away from the magic 5k!!!i get around 36mpg at 80mph and about 42mpg at 70mph. just depends on how much of a hurry your in!!!lol

Think about what you just said. Surely, by your logic, lowering the revs from 56mph to say, eh....45mph will increase fuel even more?! As long as you're not pinking the engine.
 

The Boosh!

ClioSport Admin
  Elise, Duster
Think about what you just said. Surely, by your logic, lowering the revs from 56mph to say, eh....45mph will increase fuel even more?! As long as you're not pinking the engine.
No you are wrong

56 mph IS the most economical speed you can sit at on the motorway.

something to do with combustion rate/speed reaching its equilibrium at that speed.
 

Ali

  V6, Trackhawk, GTS
yep!

Williams was funny! 250miles to 1/4 of a tank. Then 100 for the other 3/4! lol Drops like a stone. Spiders SOOKING ma fuel!
 
  Titanium 182
You'll find that the sending unit is non-linear, this is partly to do with the shape of the tank but more to do with the fact that a petrol sender unit reads hyperbolically.
 
  Evo 8 MR
Can't really collaborate on this as I rarely fill my tank, only do it for long journeys and it seems normal to drop fairly quickly at motorway speeds but what I will say is whenever the needle gets down to 1 bar I have to put petrol in otherwise it won't start if I am parked on a slight incline. So it's pretty much pointless the red bar at the bottom being there.
 
  Monaro VXR/Cupra TDi
On any long hauls I simply sit a 56-60 mph. Not sure if the consumption is that much better than 70 mph???:S
 
  330Ci (Fail)Sport
On any long hauls I simply sit a 56-60 mph. Not sure if the consumption is that much better than 70 mph???:S

My Pass Plus instructor told me you use a 1/3 more fuel driving at 70 than 60. Or a 1/3 less driving at 60 than 70. It was one of them.

No idea if it was true or not, but think he was hinting at me to slow down lol

And to the OP. I find I can get more miles on the second half of a tank than the 1st.
 
  Titanium 182
My Pass Plus instructor told me you use a 1/3 more fuel driving at 70 than 60. Or a 1/3 less driving at 60 than 70. It was one of them.

No idea if it was true or not, but think he was hinting at me to slow down lol

He's talking absolute b****cks!

You can't be so specific with it anyway, it depends on the gearing, weight and aerodynamics of a car among other aspects. All cars are different (unless we're talking about the same model of car).

Of course you'll use less petrol travelling at a lower speed, that's a given. There's less downforce being created, less drag and the engines not having to do as much work to keep a constant speed. But specifically 1/3 of petrol? lol!
 
  clio 172 cup
well 56mph is the most economical speed to sit at but it will take you ages to get anywhere. sitting at 70 instead of 80 will save you alot of pertrol though as it will lower the revs away from the magic 5k!!!i get around 36mpg at 80mph and about 42mpg at 70mph. just depends on how much of a hurry your in!!!lol

is that 1 of the reasons lorrys are restricted to 56mph?
 
  330Ci (Fail)Sport
He's talking absolute b****cks!

You can't be so specific with it anyway, it depends on the gearing, weight and aerodynamics of a car among other aspects. All cars are different (unless we're talking about the same model of car).

Of course you'll use less petrol travelling at a lower speed, that's a given. There's less downforce being created, less drag and the engines not having to do as much work to keep a constant speed. But specifically 1/3 of petrol? lol!

I assumed he meant rough figures, 1/3 in general. I thought a 1/3 was a bit of an exaggeration though so I stuck to 70 anyway.
 
well 56mph is the most economical speed to sit at but it will take you ages to get anywhere. sitting at 70 instead of 80 will save you alot of pertrol though as it will lower the revs away from the magic 5k!!!i get around 36mpg at 80mph and about 42mpg at 70mph. just depends on how much of a hurry your in!!!lol
56 isn't the most efficent speed it depends on loads of things the original 300SL merc were at that speed as it was released in an mpg vs speed graphs in the owners manuals
You'll find that the sending unit is non-linear, this is partly to do with the shape of the tank but more to do with the fact that a petrol sender unit reads hyperbolically.
the system does compensate for this but its the tank shape and tolerances which give this fuel gauage issue
On any long hauls I simply sit a 56-60 mph. Not sure if the consumption is that much better than 70 mph???:S
it is by a fair old bit
 

DMS

  A thirsty 172
Yep, mine does this. I think I mentioned it in a different thread a while back.
First third of a tank goes in about 50 miles or so, then the middle third of the tank seems to last the rest of the week (about another 200 or so miles) before it quickly gets into the red.
I tend to trust the trip computer to tell me how much fuel I've got left now. Even if the needle suggests a third of a tank has gone, it still says I've got about 300 to 350 miles worth left.

As per the posts on fuel consumption, I would tend to agree that the most economical speed to drive at is about 55mph on flat roads. On motorways I tend to find 70mph is still very economical though.
My car drinks juice on twisty roads though... something to do with my right shoe apparently...
 
Last edited:
  Black 197
I dont really notice tbh... fill up when needed, Just been to k-Tec and back (roughly 195 miles) and i was sitting nye on 100 all the way.. used just over half a tank. dunno if thats good or bad ??
 
  Renaultsport 200
If i tank my 197 the needle hardly moves for the first have and it makes me happy. The second half is a different story however.
 
  S1 16v 106 Rallye
Mines the other way round. First half goes down slowly then the second is gone in no time.
 
  G51 BEN
Right surely going at 30mph in 5th gear, you will use the same arount of petrol as travveling at 60mph in 5th gear? lets say you cover 30 miles - your car will be using petrol for a full hour to get to the destination at 30mph, whereas at 60mph, your car will be using maybe twice as much fuel for half the time? so technically should it not matter?

somebody please correct me with fancy words :)

and my digital fuel gauge is showing 1 bar - yet says i have 80 miles left (the rest of my almost full tank went in around 100 miles) and for a 1.2, my previous clio seemed to go last longer on a tank. should there be a difference between the to cars? this one is a mk2 ph3, last one was a mk2 ph2.

cheers
 
  ibiza cupra
could be something to do with the car being slightly heavyer with a full tank but i know what you mean mine does it too.
 


Top