ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
7D or 70D
- Thread starter Feirny
- Start date
I started a thread on the 70D as I was looking at buying one.
http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=721023
http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=721023
That's just made the choice a little harder. I shoot video a lot, but I also trek round track days! Argh.
Tough choice. I have a 7D as it's far more rugged and well built but the 70D is awesome for video
I'd still buy the 7D having used both but that's just because I have a 70-300L and the 70D feels a bit flimsy against it
I'd still buy the 7D having used both but that's just because I have a 70-300L and the 70D feels a bit flimsy against it
Want new ideally, yeah FF would be lovely.
FF ?
SixD.
#endthread
SixD.
#endthread
I love FF for certain things - but I still don't think it has it's place in track photography unless you have very deep pockets
Turn up at most UK tracks with a 6D and an 18-135mm and you'll be more frustrated than a guy with a 450D and a 70-200 f4L
Turn up at most UK tracks with a 6D and an 18-135mm and you'll be more frustrated than a guy with a 450D and a 70-200 f4L
Oil Burner
It's an age old question FF v's crop.
FF produces such nice images and depth of field in the images. The sensors are also typically higher resolution (albeit perhaps not per square mm of sensor) so you can crop hard into the images. The reality is that a lot of people are scared of cropping hard, and if they stopped worrying then they wouldn't really suffer too much for having FF.
People would be surprised how hard 'professional' images often are. If you can print it OK then whats the problem. The modern camera's like the 6d have such brilliant AF that they will handle a 1.4x TC quite well. So that is another option if you lack focal length on a compatible lens.
The 6d is a cracking little camera, I would have one in a heart beat if only it had more AF points near the edges. I must say the AF impressed me a lot for a consumer camera. Handled some conditions i don't think my 7d or 1d3 would have enjoyed.
The 6d would be plenty robust enough to withstand even light professional usage.
FF produces such nice images and depth of field in the images. The sensors are also typically higher resolution (albeit perhaps not per square mm of sensor) so you can crop hard into the images. The reality is that a lot of people are scared of cropping hard, and if they stopped worrying then they wouldn't really suffer too much for having FF.
People would be surprised how hard 'professional' images often are. If you can print it OK then whats the problem. The modern camera's like the 6d have such brilliant AF that they will handle a 1.4x TC quite well. So that is another option if you lack focal length on a compatible lens.
The 6d is a cracking little camera, I would have one in a heart beat if only it had more AF points near the edges. I must say the AF impressed me a lot for a consumer camera. Handled some conditions i don't think my 7d or 1d3 would have enjoyed.
The 6d would be plenty robust enough to withstand even light professional usage.
JamesBryan
ClioSport Club Member
So not always then?
Haha - just put it down to FF envy 
x
xAs Andy said no Video on the 1D MKIII
Similar threads
