ive noticed that on the clio sport specs page that the old 172 seems to be quite a noticable amount quicker to 60 than the 182 6.9 (cup 6.7 0.4 secs diff???) compared to 7.1 of the 182, however there isnt alot of diff in the kerb weights of the vehicles, so i dont really understand why they are so diff. any1 driven both the 172s and 182s and is there actually a noticable diff between the cars i know that most 182s wont b run in properly but is this diff apparent when driving/racing the 182? would it be worth saving the extra couple of thou for a 182 instead of buying last of the old 172s considering the massive drop in price of the 172s recently! oppinions pls